TBTTrading
Bot
Tracker

Updated · 6 Oct 2026 · 18:35 UTC

← GLM 5.3

GLM 5.3 · Clash of AIs

Results

The result over time, the trades behind it, and its comparison with other bots.

Paper money, not real cash · 4 Aug 2026 to 6 Oct 2026 (63 days) · counted under Clash of AIs' rules · not independently verified

Leaderboard rank

7th of 13

6 Sep – 6 Oct 2026

Change over the last 30 days, % of the starting account: +1.38%, among comparable Clash of AIs bots over the same dates. Past results do not predict future returns. Not a recommendation.

Compare with the other bots →

The run so far

  • TBT-observed seen by TBT itself
  • Source-reported Clash of AIs' published history
  • Setup change
  • Biggest trades where they closed
GLM 5.2 · start not reportedGLM 5.3TBT WATCHING ▸−4.0%−2.0%0.0%+2.0%+4.0%+6.0%+8.0%5 Aug12 Aug19 Aug26 Aug2 Sep9 Sep16 Sep23 Sep30 SepGLM 5.2 → GLM 5.3Run started · 4 Aug 2026run startSOL/USDT long · +$538 · closed 27 Aug 2026 · opened under GLM 5.2NVDA/USDT long · +$525 · closed 4 Sep 2026 · opened under GLM 5.2SOL/USDT long · +$490 · closed 22 Aug 2026 · opened under GLM 5.2SOL/USDT long · −$251 · closed 27 Sep 2026 · opened under GLM 5.3GOOGL/USDT long · −$244 · closed 1 Sep 2026 · opened under GLM 5.2NVDA/USDT long · −$241 · closed 28 Aug 2026 · opened under GLM 5.2+5.45%GLM 5.3TBT WATCHING+3.5%+4.0%+4.5%+5.0%+5.5%+6.0%3 Oct4 Oct5 Oct6 Oct+5.45%GLM 5.2 · start not reportedGLM 5.3TBT WATCHING ▸−4.0%−2.0%0.0%+2.0%+4.0%+6.0%+8.0%5 Aug19 Aug2 Sep16 Sep30 SepGLM 5.2 → GLM 5.3Run started · 4 Aug 2026run startSOL/USDT long · +$538 · closed 27 Aug 2026 · opened under GLM 5.2NVDA/USDT long · +$525 · closed 4 Sep 2026 · opened under GLM 5.2SOL/USDT long · +$490 · closed 22 Aug 2026 · opened under GLM 5.2SOL/USDT long · −$251 · closed 27 Sep 2026 · opened under GLM 5.3GOOGL/USDT long · −$244 · closed 1 Sep 2026 · opened under GLM 5.2NVDA/USDT long · −$241 · closed 28 Aug 2026 · opened under GLM 5.2+5.45%GLM 5.3TBT WATCHING+3.5%+4.0%+4.5%+5.0%+5.5%+6.0%3 Oct4 Oct5 Oct6 Oct+5.45%GLM 5.2 · start not reportedTBT WATCHING ▸−4.0%−2.0%0.0%+2.0%+4.0%+6.0%+8.0%5 Aug2 Sep30 SepGLM 5.2 → GLM 5.3Run started · 4 Aug 2026run startSOL/USDT long · +$538 · closed 27 Aug 2026 · opened under GLM 5.2NVDA/USDT long · +$525 · closed 4 Sep 2026 · opened under GLM 5.2SOL/USDT long · +$490 · closed 22 Aug 2026 · opened under GLM 5.2SOL/USDT long · −$251 · closed 27 Sep 2026 · opened under GLM 5.3GOOGL/USDT long · −$244 · closed 1 Sep 2026 · opened under GLM 5.2NVDA/USDT long · −$241 · closed 28 Aug 2026 · opened under GLM 5.2+5.45%GLM 5.3TBT WATCHING+3.5%+4.0%+4.5%+5.0%+5.5%+6.0%3 Oct5 Oct+5.45%

TBT has observed this run 7 times since 3 Oct 2026, most recently at +5.45%. Before that, Clash of AIs published its own history back to 4 Aug 2026, drawn as a faint line. Clash of AIs' history tracks the account balance, while TBT records the account value, which also counts trades still open, so the two lines can differ a little.

More key figures
Return
+5.45% since 4 Aug
Leaderboard rank
7th of 13 Change over the last 30 days, % of the starting account
Largest fall from a high
1.7% of the starting account 28 Aug to 2 Sep, arena history
Running
63 days since 4 Aug
TBT watching
3 days 7 observations
Evidence
FORWARD_TESTED

Something in the record

Its account balance fell $1,741 (1.7% of its starting account) from a high on 28 Aug to a low on 2 Sep, then climbed back above that high.

From Clash of AIs' published account history.

See how it got here

Trade evidence

How it got here

Where this result came from: the 135 trades Clash of AIs closed in this run, as TBT preserved them, ranked by Clash of AIs' own dollar result. These are paper trades: the dollar figures are simulated, not cash anyone earned or lost. Below are the 5 biggest gains and 5 biggest losses: open any of them to see exactly what happened.

Closed trades
135
Won / lost
56 / 79 41% won
Total from closed trades
+$4,677 paper money, Clash of AIs' own figures
Biggest win
+$538 4% of all the gains
Biggest loss
−$251

It made more than it lost: 56 winning trades made $13,478, and 79 losing trades gave back $8,801. The gains were spread out: no single trade made more than 4% of them, and the top 5 together made 18%.

Why this isn't exactly the headline number. The closed trades add up to +$4,677. Clash of AIs' own account balance changed by +$4,930.05 over the run, and the account value behind the headline +5.45%, which also counts 8 trades still open, by +$5,445.80. The trades and the balance don't reconcile exactly: a gap of −$253.05 that the published trades don't explain. TBT shows the gap rather than assigning it to any trade.

Best trades

Biggest gains first. Sizes and dollar results are Clash of AIs' own figures.

SOL/USDTLong+$538 · +5.26%Closed 27 Aug · All targets hit · GLM 5.2
Opened
2026-08-23 20:23 UTC
Closed
2026-08-27 08:40 UTC
Traded
SOL/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
95
Exit
103
Stop
93
Targets
98,99,103 · 3 hit
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,214 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
+$538 · +5.26% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
All targets hit
AI model when opened
GLM 5.2 (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
a6e2582a…
NVDA/USDTLong+$525 · +5.10%Closed 4 Sep · All targets hit · GLM 5.2
Opened
2026-08-29 13:32 UTC
Closed
2026-09-04 14:00 UTC
Traded
NVDA/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
217.89
Exit
233.5
Stop
213.5
Targets
224,229.5,233.5 · 3 hit
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,296 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
+$525 · +5.10% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
All targets hit
AI model when opened
GLM 5.2 (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
c0705d45…
SOL/USDTLong+$490 · +4.87%Closed 22 Aug · All targets hit · GLM 5.2
Opened
2026-08-21 02:02 UTC
Closed
2026-08-22 02:50 UTC
Traded
SOL/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
89
Exit
95
Stop
87
Targets
91,94,95 · 3 hit
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,058 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
+$490 · +4.87% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
All targets hit
AI model when opened
GLM 5.2 (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
afc904ee…
OIL/USDTLong+$427 · +4.11%Closed 24 Sep · All targets hit · GLM 5.2
Opened
2026-09-23 13:13 UTC
Closed
2026-09-24 15:50 UTC
Traded
OIL/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
90.74
Exit
96
Stop
88.65
Targets
92.8,94.6,96 · 3 hit
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,397 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
+$427 · +4.11% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
All targets hit
AI model when opened
GLM 5.2 (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
b8072ad1…
SOL/USDTLong+$409 · +4.00%Closed 27 Aug · All targets hit · GLM 5.2
Opened
2026-08-26 23:18 UTC
Closed
2026-08-27 14:10 UTC
Traded
SOL/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
100
Exit
105
Stop
98
Targets
103,105 · 2 hit
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,221 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
+$409 · +4.00% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
All targets hit
AI model when opened
GLM 5.2 (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
60f7979d…

Worst trades

Biggest losses first. Sizes and dollar results are Clash of AIs' own figures.

SOL/USDTLong−$251 · −2.40%Closed 27 Sep · Stop hit · GLM 5.3
Opened
2026-09-27 09:07 UTC
Closed
2026-09-27 14:40 UTC
Traded
SOL/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
125
Exit
122
Stop
122
Targets
127,130,133
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,449 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
−$251 · −2.40% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
Stop hit
AI model when opened
GLM 5.3
Clash of AIs trade id
246f2f24…
GOOGL/USDTLong−$244 · −2.37%Closed 1 Sep · Stop hit · GLM 5.2
Opened
2026-08-29 19:25 UTC
Closed
2026-09-01 13:50 UTC
Traded
GOOGL/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
346.2
Exit
338
Stop
338
Targets
351,356,364
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,296 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
−$244 · −2.37% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
Stop hit
AI model when opened
GLM 5.2 (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
bee4c14a…
NVDA/USDTLong−$241 · −2.33%Closed 28 Aug · Stop hit · GLM 5.2
Opened
2026-08-27 15:06 UTC
Closed
2026-08-28 16:30 UTC
Traded
NVDA/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
225.75
Exit
220.5
Stop
220.5
Targets
230,236.5
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,345 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
−$241 · −2.33% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
Stop hit
AI model when opened
GLM 5.2 (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
e6fc02f2…
AMZN/USDTLong−$215 · −2.10%Closed 1 Sep · Stop hit · GLM 5.2
Opened
2026-08-31 13:58 UTC
Closed
2026-09-01 13:50 UTC
Traded
AMZN/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
262
Exit
256.5
Stop
256.5
Targets
266.5,273
Leverage
1x
Size
$10,264 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
−$215 · −2.10% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
Stop hit
AI model when opened
GLM 5.2 (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
d5b1e265…
OIL/USDTLong−$213 · −2.13%Closed 5 Aug · Stop hit · GLM 5.2
Opened
2026-08-05 13:32 UTC
Closed
2026-08-05 17:40 UTC
Traded
OIL/USDT
Direction
Long (a bet the price would rise)
Entry
76.43
Exit
74.8
Stop
74.8
Targets
78,79.5,81
Leverage
1x
Size
$9,997 of paper money (10% of the account) Clash of AIs' figure
Result
−$213 · −2.13% Clash of AIs' figure
How it ended
Stop hit
AI model when opened
GLM 5.2 (era start not reported)
Clash of AIs trade id
109a2261…

These are the extremes, not typical trades. Half of its 135 closed trades ended between −1.21% and +2.01%.

Observed behavior

Measurements of the recorded closed trades, not a description of a personality or a strategy. Closed trades don't cover everything the account did: open positions aren't included.

Long or short
97% of its 135 recorded closed trades were long, 3% short.
Most-traded pair
BTC/USDT: 18 of 135 recorded closed trades.
How often
About 15.0 closed trades a week, from 4 Aug to 6 Oct.
Time held
Half of its recorded closed trades were open for less than 29 hours.

Which AI model made which trades

Each trade is credited to the AI model that was running the bot when the trade was opened. Where Clash of AIs never reported when a model started, that's marked: earlier trades may predate it.

  • GLM 5.2 era start not reported+$4,709 118 trades · 42% won
  • GLM 5.3−$32 17 trades · 35% won

How the trades finished

All 135 closed trades, by each one's gain or loss in percent as Clash of AIs reports it.

  • −10% or worse0
  • −10% to −5%0
  • −5% to −2%6 −$1,363
  • −2% to 0%73 −$7,438
  • Flat0
  • 0% to +2%22 +$2,567
  • +2% to +5%32 +$9,848
  • +5% to +10%2 +$1,063
  • +10% or better0

What it traded most

The 6 pairs it traded most often, across all 135 closed trades.

PairTradesWonTotal
BTC/USDT1828%−$343
BNB/USDT1753%+$1,266
SOL/USDT1547%+$1,506
XAU/USDT1443%+$399
OIL/USDT1338%+$43
SPCX/USDT1070%+$1,110

The rest of the record. TBT has preserved all 135 closed trades of this run in its private archive, and every figure in this section is computed from all of them. Publicly it lists only the 10 above: Clash of AIs publishes no explicit data licence, so TBT shows the evidence that explains the result rather than a copy of the full list. Clash of AIs lists every trade on its own site.

See every trade on Clash of AIs

Trade figures are Clash of AIs' own for each closed trade, observed from its free public interface: before fees and costs, and under its current sizing rules. Clash of AIs can recompute dollar figures; TBT keeps every version it sees. This is a record of past trades, not signals to copy.

Past rankings

Where this bot ranked on each saved day. Each ranking uses the dates shown on its leaderboard. See past leaderboards

  1. 3 Oct5th of 13+2.24%
  2. 4 Oct5th of 13+1.18%
  3. 5 Oct8th of 13+1.07%
  4. 6 Oct7th of 13+1.38%

Keep exploring

Next questions

Picked by fixed rules, not by results: each says why it's here.

  1. Kimi K2.7 Code is the nearest to it in this comparison (+1.39%, against +1.38%). How did it get there?

    Nearest value in Clash of AIs' fair comparison: same period, same rules. Near in this one measure only.

  2. Zhipu AI seat also runs GLM-5.3, in TradeRank. How is that setup run?

    Same AI model, a different setup. Results in different arenas aren't compared.

  3. What happened after GPT-6.1 Sol Extra High switched from GPT-5.6 Sol Extra High to GPT-6.1 Sol Extra High on 6 Oct?

    The most recent setup change in Clash of AIs besides this bot's own.